I just taught function transformations today and so I’ve uploaded a simple GeoGebra applet I showed in class. It’s not perfect, but it does the job. I’ll make a better one when I get a chance :-). Here you go:
I just taught function transformations today and so I’ve uploaded a simple GeoGebra applet I showed in class. It’s not perfect, but it does the job. I’ll make a better one when I get a chance :-). Here you go:
Before I get to the titular topic, let me share some links. I’ve been meaning to post links to a couple of online resources that are astonishingly thorough. I strongly encourage you to check all these out.
Math Teaching by Video
Some of these sites, especially the Khan Academy, make me wonder how long our modern American school system will remain in its present form. Will we always have a teacher in the front of the math classroom delivering instruction?
I’m not afraid of the idea that we (teachers) could be partially replaced by video lessons. It’s actually a pretty good idea. The very best instructional practices could be incorporated into a flawlessly edited video. Teachers wouldn’t make frustrating, careless mistakes, students could replay the videos at any time, and substitute teachers could easily run the class. Every school, even the poorest and most marginalized would be able to deliver top-notch, world class instruction.
And what would teachers do, then? Qualified teachers could turn their efforts toward more of “coaching” and “discussion leading” role, concentrating on one-on-one sessions, remediation, reteaching, providing feedback, grading, seminars, open forums, field trips, and inquiry-based instruction that supplements the more formal video presentations. And don’t forget blogging! 🙂 So much of a teacher’s time is currently spent preparing lessons and teaching them that they have very little time for all those other (more?) important aspects of teaching. All this time devoted to preparation is being spent by teachers everywhere. Imagine the possibilities if we devoted the bulk of our time to these other aspects instead of preparing instruction. Sounds really great to me.
Wired.com has a nice post today about Earth’s Most Stunning Fractals. I encourage you to check it out simply for the beautiful photos. None of these are fractals in the most technical mathematical sense. But they do remind us of one of the most important features of a fractal: self-similarity. As you zoom in to small areas, you see the global behavior reflected locally.
At the risk of sounding like a broken record: Dave Richeson has had some more great posts recently. These two in particular left me in awe of mathematics. Both results I had seen before, but not proved in these ways. These two proofs are so unique. Unfortunately, for my students, both of these particular proofs also require math typically not covered in high school. But that shouldn’t stop you from checking them out. In fact, both results have much simpler and more accessible proofs that I’ve linked to.
1. Irrational rotations of the circle and Benford’s law. Benford’s law is amazing. It predicts, for instance, that in a large list of spread out data, approximately 30.1% of the data will start with a “1”. The other digits have predictable frequency as well. This law allows analysts to detect fraud in data. Cool! Richeson proves Benford’s law for the powers of 2 (so…not a full proof of Benford’s) using irrational rotations of a circle. For more on Benford’s and a more straightforward justification, read the wikipedia article or one of the other sources Richeson links to.
2. Hillel Furstenberg’s proof of the infinitude of primes. There are infinite primes. For other proofs, see this page, especially the classic number-theoretic proof by Euclid. Euclid’s proof is definitely accessible to high school mathematicians, and it’s pretty elegant and exciting if you haven’t seen it before.
If you’re like me, you have trouble putting the heights of objects and land features in perspective–tall buildings are 1000 feet or more, tall mountains are 20,000 feet or more (though they rarely have a prominence of half that height), and airplanes fly at 30,000 feet. All of these features are nicely synthesized in the info-graphic below, thanks to ouramazingplanet.com. I especially appreciate all the under-water features that have been included. The creators of this image have another new info-graphic that deals with even larger distances here.
Can a function cross its horizontal asymptote? Can it be defined on its vertical asymptotes? Most students say no to both questions. But the answer to both questions is actually yes. At the beginning of every year I have to clear up this common misconception. So, let me write it all out so it’s cut and dry. We’ll start by examining a bunch of examples.
Functions that cross their horizontal asymptotes
(also try
)
Functions that are defined on their vertical asymptote
Functions defined on their vertical asymptotes are a bit more contrived, but they are completely legitimate and still pass the “vertical line test.” These functions must be defined piece-wise, like so:
What IS an asymptote?
Said loosely, an asymptote is a line that a curve gets closer to as it tends toward infinity (whereby we mean, anywhere on the outskirts of the coordinate plane). Feel free to read the wikipedia entry for all the gory details. It even mentions ‘curvilinear’ asymptotes–asymptotes that aren’t lines. Our Precalculus text mentions them too, but we don’t make a big deal about it.
The most rigorous definition of an asymptote our students see involves limits. And even then, we show you how to evaluate limits but don’t prove limits (with –
proofs!). That’s a bit different than when I took Calculus in high school. I remember learning the proofs. For those who miss them in high school, though, have no fear–a college course in elementary real analysis will feed your hunger! 🙂
So, to my students: I hope this helps clear up some issues you might have with asymptotes and frees your mind from the prototypical examples of asymptotes you might be used to!
Richard Montgomery High School will be hosting mathematician Glen Whitney on Friday, October 22. I’ll say more about it as the date approaches, but I thought I’d advertise early. He will be doing a walking ‘math tour’ of downtown Rockville. Some of our higher-level math students will be invited (students in Calculus or those who have taken it). I’m really looking forward to his talk!

Glen is the executive director of the Mathematics Museum on Long Island NY. For more information about Glen, or about the math museum, here’s an article about him. Or, visit the math museum’s website.
Here’s the article that’s on the RM website:
It’s so good to be back. I love summer, but unlike Calvin, I always enjoy returning to the school year. And I really like getting to know all of my students.

Just for fun, here’s a problem I came up with today. It combines some nice Algebra 2/Precal skills, and provides a nice exercise in analysis of functions. No calculator needed. Feel free to give answers in the comments below. In fact, feel free to suggest other similar problems.
Find the range of .
I promise I’ve been mathematically active this summer, despite my little blogging vacation (I do get the summers off, you know!). So, in one post, let me highlight some of the nice stuff I’ve seen around the web recently:
Given a randomly selected family that has two children, one of whom is a boy, what is the probability that the other is a boy?
The post is great, but the conversation in the comments is just as great. You’ll notice that I’m a heavy participant. I really liked thinking about this class of problem. It highlights some of the most treacherous territory in mathematics, probability theory. I’ll probably end up devoting an entire post to this topic sometime in the future.
And now for a bunch of books I read this summer which are all good, all of which I recommend.
If the cube has a volume of 64, what is the area of the green parallelogram? (Assume points I and J are midpoints.)

Go ahead, work it out. Then, go here for a more in depth discussion, including a video explanation. Also, see my very simple solution in the comments on that page. (My Precalculus students should especially take note!)
And, welcome, SAT Math Blog, to the internet! Thanks for pointing us to this great problem and creating the nice diagram above.