Check out this awesome blog post by Richard Clark on the Alpha Blog.

Follow the link to see lots of great pictures made with equations. These pictures are so complicated it makes you wonder, *is there any picture we ***can’t** make with *equations?* My first answer is NO.

Think about vector-based graphics. Vector graphics, for those who’ve never heard the term, are pictures/graphics that are stored as a set of instructions for redrawing the picture rather than as a large array of pixels. You’ve used vector graphics if you have ever used clip-art or used the drawing tools in Microsoft Office, or if you’ve ever used Adobe Illustrator, or Inkscape. The advantages of vector graphics include *very* small files and infinite loss-less resizeability. How can vector graphics achieve this? Well, like I said, vector graphics are stored as *rules* not *pixels*. And by rules, we could just as easily say *equation**s*.

So the answer is certainly YES we can make any picture using equations. I think the harder question is *can we make any picture using ONE equation?* Or one set of parametric equations? Or one implicit equation?

What constraints do we want to impose? Do fractals/iterative/recursive rules count?

I am curious to find out how the creators of these picture-equations came up with them. It seems infeasible to do this by trial and error, given the massive size of these equations.

Oh, and if you haven’t yet seen the Batman Curve, you better go check that out too.

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*